When Mary Magdalene, and Joanna and Mary and other women saw the angels in the empty tomb, and then testified of what they saw and knew, were they disrespecting the proper authority? (Luke 24: 1-10.) Was there something improper about them knowing something that the Lord's Apostles did not know yet? (Luke 24: 11-12.)
Was there something wrong with the Lord appearing to, and speaking with Mary on the morning of His resurrection, even before He returned to His Father? (John 20: 11-17.)
Was there something improper, too sacred, or too private in these events to prevent these witnesses from testifying of them? Isn't everyone required to bear their testimony of the Lord? If those who can read the Lord's revelation are required to testify they have "heard his voice" (D&C 18: 35-36) how much greater an obligation is imposed upon those who have seen Him?
Testimony of Christ is not co-equal with presiding. All who can do so should testify. Presiding, however, is based on the common consent given exclusively to those who are in the church's hierarchy. Unless sustained to such presiding positions, no one has the right to such office. (D&C 26: 2; 28: 13.)
No comments:
Post a Comment
What Say You?