There are "signs" that show a person is not apostate. Mormon's teachings to his son recount the signs which show God is saving souls. These teachings are in Chapter 7 of Moroni's book. The whole text is worth careful study.
Moroni records that God will let all mankind know with power and great glory at the last day that "the day of miracles" has never ceased. (Moroni 7: 35.) Nor have angels ceased to appear and teach those who are in need of instruction. (Moroni 7: 36.) Nor has the "power" of the Holy Ghost receded. (Id.) This is because these things are required for "one man upon the face [of the earth] to be saved." (Id.)
When there is faith, there are miracles. (Moroni 7: 37.) When there is faith, then angels minister to the faithful. (Id.)
If the time comes when there are no more miracles and there are no more angels ministering to mankind, then it is because of "unbelief, and all is lost." (Id.)
Moroni explains in simplicity and clarity: "For no man can be saved, according to the words of Christ, save they shall have faith in his name; wherefore, if these things have ceased, then has faith ceased also; and awful is the state of man, for they are as though there had been no redemption made." (Moroni 7: 38.)
The priestly tradition mentioned here can provide the rites, teach the doctrine and preserve the truth, but the underlying reality must be pursued for salvation. Moroni explains how we must push beyond the mere symbol to the reality.
Rites may teach us about conversing with the Lord through the veil. However, when the rite is over it leaves you with only the idea, the outline, the admonition of how the Gospel operates. Then it is up to you to pursue the practice of the rites by your life, your faithfulness, and calling upon God to know Him.
Signs do not produce faith and never have. Signs do, always, and will forever, follow faith. (D&C 63: 9.) Moroni taught sound doctrine.
For each of us, the priestly tradition is never enough. Ancient Israel had their rites, observances, feasts and rituals. They could acquire ceremonial cleanliness by following the rules for purification. But, as the Lord observed, outward cleanliness can belie the inward filth if they failed to connect with God. (Matt. 23: 25-28.) It is always easier to be ritually clean and religiously pure than it is to be approved of God. It is much easier to rise inside an organization than it is to part the veil.
However, for those who seek God, no amount of praise in this world can tempt them to ignore the path of faith where they encounter the Holy Ghost, angels, the Lord, and the Father. (John 14: 23; D&C 130: 3.)
Showing posts with label Mormon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mormon. Show all posts
Thursday, June 21, 2012
Monday, May 28, 2012
Mosiah 3: 7
This verse is the greatest summary of what the Lord would suffer in atoning for man's sins given before His mortality. King Benjamin is given this instruction because God wants all mankind to understand the great sacrifice made by the Lord Omnipotent.
Christ suffered "even more than man can suffer, except it be unto death" as part of the burden He bore. (Mosiah 3: 7.) What was the burden?
First on the angel's list is "temptations." Isaiah would call it "our griefs" and "our sorrows" and "our transgressions" and "our iniquities." (Isa. 53: 4-5.) Alma would call it "afflictions and temptations of every kind." (Alma 7: 11.) Paul explained how He "who knew no sin" was made "to be sin" for our sake. (2 Cor. 5: 21.) In other words, though Christ was not personally responsible for any transgression, He was made accountable for every one of all our transgressions. He was made "to be sin" and to feel the loathsome filthiness of our unworthiness before God.
Mormon had been in the Lord's presence. He knew how painful it was to be before God in our fallen and guilty state. Mormon explained how terrible it is to bring the weight of your own sins into God's holy presence. He describes it as "under a consciousness of your guilt" and "a consciousness of guilt that ye have ever abused his laws" and "more miserable to dwell with a holy and just God, under a consciousness of your filthiness before him, than ye would be to dwell with the damned souls in hell." (Mormon 9: 3-4.) He explains that in God's presence "ye shall be brought to see your nakedness before God" and it "will kindle a flame of unquenchable fire upon you." (Mormon 9: 5.) Since Mormon had been there, and knew what it was like to behold God's holy presence, he understood the great challenge we all face if we do not repent.
When the prophet Isaiah was brought into God's presence he collapsed in guilt and anguish, proclaiming, "Woe is me! for I am undone; because I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips: for mine eyes have seen the King, the Lord of Hosts." (Isa. 6: 5.)
Beholding God brings with it the keenest appreciation of your own unworthiness before Him so it is possible to understand He is a "just and holy Being" in whom there is no darkness.
Christ succumbed to no temptations. Yet He was made to feel the guilt and misery of all mankind's great surrender to sin. Christ explained what that involved when He declared: "repent, lest I smite you by the rod of my mouth, and by my wrath, and by my anger, and your sufferings be sore--how sore you know not, how exquisite you know not, yea, how hard to bear you know not. For behold, I, God, have suffered these things for all, that they might not suffer if they would repent; But if they would not repent they must suffer even as I." (D&C 19: 15-17.) Christ, looking back on His atonement, called the pain of it "exquisite" and "hard to bear" from a distance of two millennia.
The scriptures tell us how His suffering was accomplished. As He knelt in prayer, He was visited by a "just and holy being" to borrow Mormon's words. (Luke 22: 43.) There, in the presence of the Father, Christ struggled through all the guilt, sorrow, nakedness, consciousness of guilt, and torment of being sinful, unworthy, unclean, and having ever transgressed the law of God. It was an unquenchable fire of emotion and pain, torment of mind, and recognition of failure before God. He, like all the wicked, "trembled because of pain" and "shrank" away from God in horror at His condition. (D&C 19: 18.)
Abraham was on the mount with the knife in his hand at the sacrifice of Isaac, and God the Father was present at the sacrifice of His Son. Indeed, Christ's sufferings required the Father to be present in order to reconcile man to the Father. It was the presence of the Father that made the suffering possible. Therefore, we know the identity of the unnamed angel in Luke. (Luke 22: 43.) Christ could not have suffered the guilt of all mankind in the presence of a just and holy God, unless during this moment of torment His suffering was before that very Being.
Christ suffered "even more than man can suffer, except it be unto death" as part of the burden He bore. (Mosiah 3: 7.) What was the burden?
First on the angel's list is "temptations." Isaiah would call it "our griefs" and "our sorrows" and "our transgressions" and "our iniquities." (Isa. 53: 4-5.) Alma would call it "afflictions and temptations of every kind." (Alma 7: 11.) Paul explained how He "who knew no sin" was made "to be sin" for our sake. (2 Cor. 5: 21.) In other words, though Christ was not personally responsible for any transgression, He was made accountable for every one of all our transgressions. He was made "to be sin" and to feel the loathsome filthiness of our unworthiness before God.
Mormon had been in the Lord's presence. He knew how painful it was to be before God in our fallen and guilty state. Mormon explained how terrible it is to bring the weight of your own sins into God's holy presence. He describes it as "under a consciousness of your guilt" and "a consciousness of guilt that ye have ever abused his laws" and "more miserable to dwell with a holy and just God, under a consciousness of your filthiness before him, than ye would be to dwell with the damned souls in hell." (Mormon 9: 3-4.) He explains that in God's presence "ye shall be brought to see your nakedness before God" and it "will kindle a flame of unquenchable fire upon you." (Mormon 9: 5.) Since Mormon had been there, and knew what it was like to behold God's holy presence, he understood the great challenge we all face if we do not repent.
When the prophet Isaiah was brought into God's presence he collapsed in guilt and anguish, proclaiming, "Woe is me! for I am undone; because I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips: for mine eyes have seen the King, the Lord of Hosts." (Isa. 6: 5.)
Beholding God brings with it the keenest appreciation of your own unworthiness before Him so it is possible to understand He is a "just and holy Being" in whom there is no darkness.
Christ succumbed to no temptations. Yet He was made to feel the guilt and misery of all mankind's great surrender to sin. Christ explained what that involved when He declared: "repent, lest I smite you by the rod of my mouth, and by my wrath, and by my anger, and your sufferings be sore--how sore you know not, how exquisite you know not, yea, how hard to bear you know not. For behold, I, God, have suffered these things for all, that they might not suffer if they would repent; But if they would not repent they must suffer even as I." (D&C 19: 15-17.) Christ, looking back on His atonement, called the pain of it "exquisite" and "hard to bear" from a distance of two millennia.
The scriptures tell us how His suffering was accomplished. As He knelt in prayer, He was visited by a "just and holy being" to borrow Mormon's words. (Luke 22: 43.) There, in the presence of the Father, Christ struggled through all the guilt, sorrow, nakedness, consciousness of guilt, and torment of being sinful, unworthy, unclean, and having ever transgressed the law of God. It was an unquenchable fire of emotion and pain, torment of mind, and recognition of failure before God. He, like all the wicked, "trembled because of pain" and "shrank" away from God in horror at His condition. (D&C 19: 18.)
Abraham was on the mount with the knife in his hand at the sacrifice of Isaac, and God the Father was present at the sacrifice of His Son. Indeed, Christ's sufferings required the Father to be present in order to reconcile man to the Father. It was the presence of the Father that made the suffering possible. Therefore, we know the identity of the unnamed angel in Luke. (Luke 22: 43.) Christ could not have suffered the guilt of all mankind in the presence of a just and holy God, unless during this moment of torment His suffering was before that very Being.
Thursday, September 23, 2010
3 Nephi 11: 22
3 Nephi 11: 22:
None of those who received this power had any doubt about their authority to act in this ordinance in the Lord's name. None of them lacked the "power" to baptize others. None of those who were present, and still kneeling during the ceremony, or who overheard the Lord's words had any doubts about those who held a commission from Christ to baptize them. Finally, none of those present would have any doubts about the need to be baptized by this newly bestowed power.
Although every one of them had been baptized previously, it becomes apparent that once new power to baptize has been given by Christ, that power ought to be used. It is not given to be neglected. Nor can power endure through neglect. So when given, the power is to be used, and all who were present are candidates for baptism.
Then comes the instruction from Christ as to the manner for performing the ordinance. "On this wise shall ye baptize..." begins the instruction. If the Lord provides the power and then gives the instruction, can the ordinance be changed? What if someone else says they hold the keys, and we all accept the person does in fact hold the keys, can such a person change the manner of baptism? If there is a potential convert who is infirm, ill or elderly and is unable to be baptized in the prescribed manner, can the ordinance be changed in form to accommodate the need? That is exactly how the ordinance was changed after the New Testament times. A reasonable need, and accommodation for that need, resulted in an exception. Then the exception became the rule, and the original manner was forgotten.
If the Lord's instruction regarding the manner of baptism in this verse cannot be changed, even by one holding keys and authority to do so, then what about other ordinances? Can other ordinances be changed by one who holds keys if they choose to do them differently? Why not? What happens when the one in a recognized position to perform ordinances decides to make changes to the ordinances?
Assume for a moment the Lord instructs Nephi on how to perform baptism, but Nephi decides thereafter to make a change to it. How would that reflect on Nephi? How would that reflect on the Lord? How would it reflect on the Lord's instruction? What about Joseph Smith's statement: "Ordinances instituted in the heavens before the foundation of the world, in the priesthood, for the salvation of men, are not to be altered or changed." (TPJS p. 308) If the Lord gave Nephi the "power" to baptize, does that carry with it the "power" to change it as well?
Well, the purpose behind the Lord giving instructions was that "there shall be no disputations among you." Does the instruction given by the Lord end as soon as we begin to see "disputations among" followers? Can an opinion poll that shows a majority of those who practice the ordinances don't relate to them anymore and want to see them altered, create a "disputation" that allows the instruction from the Lord to be altered?
As stupid as these questions may seem, there are people who are genuinely confused by them. So I ask them. You must decide if the Lord's instructions deserve respect and ought to be followed. Apparently men of good faith, honest hearts, and sincere desires can by reason of their status alone, contradict the Lord's instructions and people won't even blink. That's the beauty of the claim that Rome makes to having Peter's keys and the ability to seal on earth and in heaven. The Catholics can change anything and no one doubts they had the authority to do it. To allow the possibility that God would not support the Pope would be to entertain the unthinkable. So don't even hold that thought.
"And again the Lord called others, and said unto them likewise; and he gave unto them power to baptize. And he said unto them: On this wise shall ye baptize; and there shall be no disputations among you."
Space was limited and the mechanics of writing was difficult for Mormon. Therefore, in his abridgement of the account, for all others "the Lord called," and the ceremony was repeated for each. In the process, He "said likewise" unto each of them. Every individual person was acknowledged by the Lord as having conferred upon each of them "power to baptize" by the Lord.
Space was limited and the mechanics of writing was difficult for Mormon. Therefore, in his abridgement of the account, for all others "the Lord called," and the ceremony was repeated for each. In the process, He "said likewise" unto each of them. Every individual person was acknowledged by the Lord as having conferred upon each of them "power to baptize" by the Lord.
None of those who received this power had any doubt about their authority to act in this ordinance in the Lord's name. None of them lacked the "power" to baptize others. None of those who were present, and still kneeling during the ceremony, or who overheard the Lord's words had any doubts about those who held a commission from Christ to baptize them. Finally, none of those present would have any doubts about the need to be baptized by this newly bestowed power.
Although every one of them had been baptized previously, it becomes apparent that once new power to baptize has been given by Christ, that power ought to be used. It is not given to be neglected. Nor can power endure through neglect. So when given, the power is to be used, and all who were present are candidates for baptism.
Then comes the instruction from Christ as to the manner for performing the ordinance. "On this wise shall ye baptize..." begins the instruction. If the Lord provides the power and then gives the instruction, can the ordinance be changed? What if someone else says they hold the keys, and we all accept the person does in fact hold the keys, can such a person change the manner of baptism? If there is a potential convert who is infirm, ill or elderly and is unable to be baptized in the prescribed manner, can the ordinance be changed in form to accommodate the need? That is exactly how the ordinance was changed after the New Testament times. A reasonable need, and accommodation for that need, resulted in an exception. Then the exception became the rule, and the original manner was forgotten.
If the Lord's instruction regarding the manner of baptism in this verse cannot be changed, even by one holding keys and authority to do so, then what about other ordinances? Can other ordinances be changed by one who holds keys if they choose to do them differently? Why not? What happens when the one in a recognized position to perform ordinances decides to make changes to the ordinances?
Assume for a moment the Lord instructs Nephi on how to perform baptism, but Nephi decides thereafter to make a change to it. How would that reflect on Nephi? How would that reflect on the Lord? How would it reflect on the Lord's instruction? What about Joseph Smith's statement: "Ordinances instituted in the heavens before the foundation of the world, in the priesthood, for the salvation of men, are not to be altered or changed." (TPJS p. 308) If the Lord gave Nephi the "power" to baptize, does that carry with it the "power" to change it as well?
Well, the purpose behind the Lord giving instructions was that "there shall be no disputations among you." Does the instruction given by the Lord end as soon as we begin to see "disputations among" followers? Can an opinion poll that shows a majority of those who practice the ordinances don't relate to them anymore and want to see them altered, create a "disputation" that allows the instruction from the Lord to be altered?
As stupid as these questions may seem, there are people who are genuinely confused by them. So I ask them. You must decide if the Lord's instructions deserve respect and ought to be followed. Apparently men of good faith, honest hearts, and sincere desires can by reason of their status alone, contradict the Lord's instructions and people won't even blink. That's the beauty of the claim that Rome makes to having Peter's keys and the ability to seal on earth and in heaven. The Catholics can change anything and no one doubts they had the authority to do it. To allow the possibility that God would not support the Pope would be to entertain the unthinkable. So don't even hold that thought.
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
Pollutions
The great latter day "pollutions" referred to by Mormon in Mormon 8: 31 are the behaviors of men; not environmental waste. Mormon identifies what those "pollutions" are: "murders, and robbing, and lying, and deceivings, and whoredoms, and all manner of abominations."
Those are harsh indictments. But it becomes even more harsh when Mormon identifies US as the culprits. He calls us "pollutions." He tells us we have polluted the "holy Church of God." That can only mean the Restored Church. Sobering indeed.
"O ye pollutions, ye hypocrites, ye teachers, who sell yourselves for that which will canker, why have ye polluted the holy church of God?" (Mormon 8: 38.) Remember that Mormon saw us. Jesus Christ showed Mormon US. He was in a unique position to accurately tell us what ails us. (Mormon 8: 35.)
So why do we think ourselves in good spiritual condition? Why are we confident we aren't condemned by the Lord? Why do we presume that as Latter-day Saints we are safe. Why do we think Mormon is talking to all those other churches; churches who will never read his book, and therefore cannot be warned by it? It defies common sense, really.
We are in a lot of trouble. He's trying to help us. How foolish to think we can line up beside him and point the finger away from ourselves. He won't let us do that, you know. He's pointing the finger right at us.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)