I have been called, among other choice words, "apostate" by some LDS folks in their indiscriminate, anonymous on-line rants. Name-calling by Latter-day Saints is a complete role
reversal from where the Restoration began. When Joseph Smith was being abused
by the religionists of his day, he observed “they treated my communication not
only lightly, but with great contempt, saying it was all of the devil. That there
were no such things as visions or revelations in these days; that all such
things [were confined to and the sole right of] the apostles.” (JS-H 1: 21.)
The people who rejected Joseph’s beliefs were rejecting the Bible itself, which
they pretended was the basis for their faith. Joseph did what James 1: 5
instructed him to do, and got an answer. That is the faith he restored: A
living faith in which God will speak to all who, like me, lack wisdom, liberally. I lack wisdom. I go to God with questions. So long as any of us ask in
faith, He will answer. I know. He has answered me. Now Latter-day Saints think it is their right to denounce others who
have asked God, and have been answered. If Latter-day Saints do possess the
truth, then for those they think in error should be met with kindness, not
reviling. (See JS-H 1: 25.) “If they suppose me to be deluded they ought to
endeavor in a proper and affectionate manner to reclaim me.” (JS-H 1: 28.)
Instead I read the accusation I am “apostate” by these smug Latter-day Saints. It must put a smile on the faces of authority and the devil. These disciples pretend to follow Joseph's restored religion while acting the part of his persecutors. The saints have come full circle indeed.
Where exactly do you draw the line and begin to denounce
others as “apostate?”
If we both believe in the Book of Mormon, are we of the same
faith or is one of us “apostate?”
If we both believe Joseph Smith was called of God to restore
the Gospel, are we of the same faith or is one of us “apostate?”
If we both accept the Doctrine and Covenants and Pearl of
Great Price as scripture, are we of the same faith or is one of us “apostate?”
If we both believe in continuing revelation and that God has
yet to reveal a great deal as part of the Restoration of all, are we of the
same faith or is one of us “apostate?”
If we have all of the foregoing in common, is that enough to
respect one another as fellow-believers? Or do you require much more of me than
I can give in order to avoid being denounced by you? How much do you want to
micromanage my beliefs? Do you ever feel any twinge of concern about not
permitting others to worship “according to the dictates of their conscience,
and allow others the same privilege, let them worship how, where, or what they
may?” (Paraphrase of 11th Article of Faith)
If I believe priesthood has no authority over me, and you
believe as Elder Oaks declared from general conference that the “keys” are the
right to exercise authority, are we of the same faith or is one of us “apostate?”
What if my belief is based on the scripture “no power or influence can or
ought to be maintained by virtue of the priesthood” which I hold in higher
regard than a declaration from a church official to the contrary? (See D&C121: 41)
If I believe the Lectures on Faith are still scripture, but
you do not, are we of the same faith or is one of us “apostate?”
If I believe the LDS Church has changed dramatically in my
lifetime, and even more since Joseph Smith died, are we of the same faith or
is one of us “apostate?”
If I believe the scriptures were given to control and govern
the faith, and you believe whatever comes from living church officials can
contradict or disregard the words of scripture, are we of the same faith or is
one of us “apostate?” If I can tolerate your view in this regard, even if I do
not share it, are we of the same faith or is one of us “apostate?” If I use the scriptures and you use the scriptures, why are
your views correct and mine incorrect? How did we arrive at the odd position that you get to call me “apostate”
for believing the scriptures differently than you do? If you trust that “keys”
are the thing that guarantees you salvation, what exactly are the “keys,” allowed by scripture, that bear that out?
If I will let you go in peace, why cannot you let me go likewise in peace. The LDS church is an institution of
this world, not of the next. We should care less for the things of this world than we do. I am very content with my faith in God, and very much in harmony with
everything He has asked of me. If you believe the same about yourself, then let
that be your assurance and have the confidence to leave me to go my way in peace.
Practice your beliefs in the way you think God wants, and I will
do the same.
I will never again submit to another man’s priestly claim to dominion, control, judgment or oppression. It was denounced in scripture,
and I reject such things. (D&C 121: 36-42.) If you think there is a priest who has the right to demand things of you in exchange for saving you using some “key,” I do not share your belief, but I am perfectly willing
to respect you if that is yours. Happy is the man who serves his God in faith
and conviction. Happier still is the man whose God is Christ and therefore respects
his right to voluntarily act for himself, accepting full accountability for his
beliefs, and not expecting man to save him using authority to do so.
If, by your definition, I am “apostate,” then let me assure you
I am content to be so. I am fully willing to accept whatever Christ’s judgment
is for being so. More importantly, I am entirely satisfied I remain in harmony with what God
expects of me, and I wish the same for you.